Home| Quick Tour | The Principles | The Path | Teaching the Principles | Essays | Technique | Philosophy | Book Reviews|MP3's |Forum |Testimonials |Links |FAQ | Contact Us | Store

 
The Principles of Practice
Based on "The Principles of Correct Practice for Guitar"
by Jamie Andreas
 
IN THIS ISSUE
July 15, 2001 Volume 52
FEATURE ARTICLE

The Three Levels of Practice

Because of the time spent on guitarprinciples, it has been almost 2 years since I have given a concert. I have been feeling the need for the flesh and blood experience of playing music for people face to face, and so this Friday I am giving a concert in my local area. So, I thought I would take this opportunity to talk a little bit about the subject of concert preparation.

The last chapter in "The Principles" deals with this subject under the heading "The 3 Levels of Practice". It is very important to understand these 3 levels, in order to reach the point where all of our practicing is actually able to bear fruit and deliver to us and others the end result of our efforts: the creation and enjoyment of music.

I usually spend a lot of time discussing the first level of practice, Microscopic Practice, which is the extremely focused practice that deals mostly with the physical aspects of the playing process. I do this not only because it is the foundation of everything else, but also because it is the most neglected level of practice, often not spoken of at all! But now, in preparation for performing, I must spend a good amount of time on the other 2 levels of practice, Assimilating and Shaping.

Assimilating is where we "put the music together". We take the pieces of the music we have been working on separately and stitch them together into large sections. As we do so, we begin to relate to the music emotionally, and form ideas as to how we wish to convey the music in our playing. Since I have played most of this music many times, I am spending most of my time now at the third level of practice: Shaping.

Shaping is closest to actually performing. Here, I am playing the music, listening, feeling, and thinking as I play, and seeing where I want to make changes, and where I need to return to Level One practice, if I find my fingers a little un-cooperative in giving me what I want. Shaping could be called "practicing playing". It is here that we try to simulate the experience of actually performing, where the music must be delivered all in "one piece". There are many reasons to do this: one is that no matter how well you do your other practice, you never really know where all the "trouble spots" will be until you try to put it all together.

I remember my first concert. For some strange reason, I did almost no Level Three Practice (not that anyone told me I should)! My preparation consisted of working on the music in "bits and pieces" and I didn't just sit and play the music as a part of my preparation. Well, it wasn't my finest hour! Together, I and the audience discovered where all those "trouble spots" really were!

If we use the analogy of having a part in a play, then, Level One is the simple reading and memorizing of the lines, getting the articulation and pronunciation of the words and sentences clear. Assimilation is the grouping together of lines by scenes, and beginning to speak the lines with meaning and expression, and the beginning of the memorization process. Shaping is putting the final touches on everything, discovering and adding the nuances of expression that will bring everything to it's fullest artistic expression.

Knowing how and when to move between the 3 levels of practice is essential to functioning as a musician. It is for this reason that some type of performing is necessary in our lives, because it gives us the reason for needing to go through this whole process. Without it, many players end up in the common state of knowing bits and pieces of lots of songs, and playing those bits and pieces to varying levels of perfection (and imperfection!).

For more understanding of these matters, read "The Importance of Repertoire" .

SPECIAL COMMENTARY

No Tempo to Slow Tempo Practice

Hi Jamie,

When is the switch point from no-Tempo work, to Tempo work? When you've gotten all the chords down and can switch between them fairly well? Or wait until you can switch really smooth and fast?

Also, my body and hand cringe when doing the G7 chord since I have to make this Frankenstein claw in order not to touch adjacent strings. I'll bring my hand all the way under the neck, lopsided to keep only on those 3 strings. Which tenses up my shoulder, wrist, etc. I can relax my shoulder but that's one heck of a wrist bend, when trying to perform the heavy-hand. Any tips?

Thanks again for the book - already read it over twice. Gonna start my third reading tonite :) I keep finding little ideas in there I didn't pick up before.

Your book should be a mandatory purchase for all beginner guitar students, IMHO :))


Let's say you have some new music in front of you. You look at it, and there are some new chords you don't even know. You realize it is going to take a lot of practice to even get your fingers into that shape, much less switch into and out of it. At this point, practicing at a tempo is not in sight yet. Now, after a good amount of time practicing no tempo moving into that chord, so that you are not experiencing lock up, and you have done a good amount of posing to reduce body tension you are ready to try a tempo (usually you will have it memorized or almost memorized at this point). For chord forms, your first tempo should be METRONOME ON 60, TAKING A FULL 8 CLICKS FOR THE CHANGE. Then, go to 80 and 100 at 8 clicks, follow the Basic Practice Approach from there.

When you first try a tempo, you watch and study the fingers. They will tell you if you are ready to proceed with a faster tempo, or if you need more no tempo practice. If you cannot make the move reasonably smoothly in the 8 clicks, you need more no tempo practice. At any point where smooth movement is breaking down, you need more no tempo practice, but you also need to have discovered the nature of the breakdown. If your 3rd fingers is not landing in the right spot on time BECAUSE IT IS TENSING in reaction to the movement of the 2nd finger, and perhaps actually moving AWAY from its destination, causing you to then have to try to pull the tensed finger into position (what I call "tug of war"), then, no amount of practice, no tempo or slow tempo will help until that situation is discovered and addressed. (I'd read that sentence over a few times if I were you!)

Your question is a great one, very germane to the practice process. In fact, I have touched upon it in the opening article on the levels of practice. You see, in actual practice, you will be going from slow tempo, to no tempo, to up tempo all the time, sometimes in quick succession, based on the principles I outlined in the previous paragraph.

Now, as far as that G7 chord goes, first of all, realize that the position the hand needs to assume for that "simple" chord is quite demanding. The most important things are to have the hand and wrist out away from the neck, not hugging it, AND, the distal joints (the last joint of the finger). Those distal joints, especially on the 2nd finger must be VERY flexed, in fact, about a 90 degree angle for that 2nd finger. Now, it does depend on the type of guitar neck you are playing on. I have put some pictures of this chord up for you. I am doing it on a classical, so the neck is wide, and the distal joint must be very bent. Check them out.

Lack of bend in the distal joints is common, and is a basic flaw in "form" for many people. Read my little piece on it.

Also, some good news. You don't HAVE to do that 2nd finger note on that chord, I usually don't. It is the "3rd" of the chord, harmonically speaking, and is already present in the open 2nd string, so playing it actually adds nothing to the chord (you only need one 3rd). I don' t have time to explain it here, so take my word for it. Of course, you will need the same finger ability for other things, so you should still pay attention to what I said, but if you need the chord for a gig this Saturday, I take the easy way out it I were you!

It's great you are reading and re-reading my book. That is as it should be. I absolutely agree, in my not so humble opinion, EVERY guitar player should read my book. And I say this as much for the sake of all of you as for myself!

FROM OUR READERS

Chord Melody

Hi Jamie,

I have read you talking about chord melody and I have heard other people talking about it also.
Can you briefly explain what it is and how to use it?

Thanks,
Mike from Orange County "California"

Hi Mike,

Yes, good question. When I was a beginning player, I learned chords, and after a few months I knew a whole lot of songs that I could sit and play and sing. And that was great. In fact, the first time I saw someone up close playing the guitar (a family friend), that is what they were doing, and I thought it was the greatest thing I had ever seen and desperately wanted to do it to.

But after about a year, I began to feel very frustrated and restless, just strumming and singing. I knew there had to be something more you could do with this instrument, and occasionally I would hear someone doing something more, but I couldn't figure out exactly what it was, or how you got to be able to do it.

I was in lessons with my first teacher at the time, and I heard the student before me doing something much more interesting than just strumming and singing. He was doing something more like what the piano does. You could tell what the song was even though no one was singing because he was playing the notes of the melody as well as lots of other notes that sounded good with it, and filled it out.

I very excitedly asked my teacher about it, and he told me it was "chord melody", and that we would be getting to it when I hit "Mel Bay #3". He said it was a method of playing the chords and the melody at the same time. I was totally mystified, because up to that time, I had done either one or the other. I could read notes, and I could play melodies. I could strum chords to a song. But how it was possible to do both at the same time I couldn't imagine, and I couldn't wait to find the answer to this great mystery.

So, finally I got to Mel Bay #3 and the mystery began to unravel. I began to understand the true relationship of chords to melody. I began to understand that a chord is a bunch of notes that sound good together, and that a melody note is USUALLY contained in the chord itself. Now, since a chord is a bunch of notes, you can arrange those notes in different orders on the guitar when you play. You can make a particular note the "top" note, that is, the highest sounding one. If I play a C chord, I can make the "g" note it contains stand on top by placing my 4th finger on the 1st string, 3rd fret, instead of having it buried in the chord on the open 3rd string.

(If you are not clear on exactly what "melody" means, think of it this way: when you strum chords and sing the song, you are singing the melody. A melody is INDIVIDUAL notes moving in a recognizable pattern. In fact, without the melody, we usually can't recognize the song. The chords are a background "wall of sound" against which the melody is played. Imagine seeing a play on stage. The set scenery is the chords. When the actors come out, they are the melody, the actual "what's happening" in the play).

The trick in chord melody is to play the chords of the song, but always place the melody note required by the song on TOP of the chord. This way, your ear hears that note as being prominent, which essentially means that it hears the note as the melody. And here is the tricky part. In order to do that, you have to know LOTS of chords, or what are more properly called "chord forms", different versions, or "voicing" of the same chord. You have to know the forms that will give you the various chord notes you need as the top note of the chord. There are a lot and it takes a lot of study.

However, I really want to make the point that I can't think of an area of guitar study that has been more satisfying and useful to me than the study of chord melody. To be able to sit down and simply look at a "lead sheet" (a bare bones melody and chord symbol chart of a song) and compose an arrangement on the spot is a wonderful thing, and that is what you can do if you know chord melody. If you don't know it, you are relegated to the world of "strummers" for the rest of your life!

Knowing chord melody is also great when you are accompanying yourself or someone else singing, because you can put in a nice solo between verses, even if there are no other players around to fill out the sound.

I try to move all students into this study and think it should be in all students' future plans, no matter what style you play, because your abilities in any style will be advanced by this knowledge. It is the jazz people that have this down to a science, so go to those sources. If you would like to grow into this ability at some point in your playing life, then add it to the list of reasons why it is a good idea to learn to read music, and acquire, over time, a knowledge of music theory.



Hi Jamie,

I received the Principles book from you a few weeks ago here in Australia. I'm just writing to say thanks and let you know the immediate effect it has had.

Along with a few other contributing factors in my life (it's funny how a number of significant things co-incide) the principles in your book have helped me turn a corner I've been stuck on for the last few years.

Nearly everything in the book is a well articulated point that I've heard before, but I feel like you've put a thread through all of them and pulled it tight bringing the disparate pearls of wisdom into a single bag of jewels.

As a teacher I feel very responsible for the influence I can have on the foundation of my students' playing. I have a new stronger belief in my ability to do this thanks to your shared experiences and ideas.

I don't want to sound too over the top - but I understand the excitement YOU must get when someone likes me tells you what a difference you've made.

Thanks once again

Elliott F

COPYRIGHT INFORMATION

All material copyright © 2003 by Jamie Andreas, GuitarPrinciples.com

Guitar Principles is a trademark of Jamie World, Inc.
Copyright 2000 - 2003 Jamie World, Inc. All rights reserved.