Home| Quick Tour | The Principles | The Path | Teaching the Principles | Essays | Technique | Philosophy | Book Reviews|MP3's |Forum |Testimonials |Links |FAQ | Contact Us | Store

 
The Principles of Practice
Based on "The Principles of Correct Practice for Guitar"
by Jamie Andreas
 
IN THIS ISSUE
April 6, 2003 Volume 113

Outside the Box

The great French philosopher Rene Descartes ushered in a new era of human history in the seventeenth century, when he uttered his famous dictum "I think therefore I am" ("cogito ergo sum). This pronouncement, and its implications, expressed the paradigm that made possible the extensive manipulation of our physical world which gave rise to the Industrial Revolution which has brought forth the utopia in which we now live (sarcasm intended).

How did it do that? By positing the fact of his existence on the awareness of thought, Descartes introduced the notion that the "thinker" is different than the "thought". He unknowingly assumed that there is an entity called "I" that is separate from what is outside itself, and can objectively observe that outside reality. Because it stressed the existence of this "I" as a mental being, it also helped create the split between mind and body that is characteristic of Western, as opposed to Eastern thought.

This way of thinking does have a lot to say for itself, it can be very useful as far as it goes. By assuming that "I" am a mental being that can objectively study and manipulate what is outside of me, I can learn science and build cool machines, win friends and influence people. However, for those interested in actually being able to understand the nature of reality, (and in fact, live life to the fullest), it will be found to be a paradigm that leads to inevitable dead ends. It has the advantage of providing the basis for traditional scientific method, which is founded in the ability to measure, and predict. But not all of "what is" can be measured, predicted, or even known by the mind.

In any case, the discoveries of relativity and quantum physics have proven the limitations of this paradigm. We know now that there are levels of reality that cannot be observed objectively, but in fact are changed by the very process of observation. We know now that, just as the ancient yogis and other wise men realized for themselves, and taught to others, we live in a Universe that is "alive", and we are connected to it, and it is connected to us. This is sometimes called "the participatory nature of reality" (see the classic "The Tao Of Physics" for further explanation).

This assumption (which means "untested belief") that we are an independent entity that can observe a universe outside of us as if we were watching a machine, is very dangerous. It is also very common, because the popular consciousness has not caught up with 20th century physics (even though it has been proven that time does not exist outside the mind, few of us really live as if we believed it.) The greatest danger that we face when we base our lives on this assumption is that we begin to believe that the way we "think" things are, is the way they really "are". We never discover the real truth: things aren't anything in and of themselves, every "thing" we observe is being, literally, influenced (we may say created), by us, in every moment.

Now, you may be saying "hmmm, yes, that is all well and good! Haven't thought about it lately, but yes, now that you bring it up, it makes perfect sense. I believe it is exactly right. But, WHAT DOES THAT HAVE TO DO WITH ME AS A GUITAR PLAYER!!??


The fact is, it has to do with everybody as an anything! But for we guitar players, it is why, for instance, we are capable of sitting there and practicing and not being aware at all of the full reality of what is happening, why we can be so unaware of our bodies, because we are so used to being tucked up tightly inside our heads, thinking, thinking, thinking, and missing everything! Our attention is constricted, bound to our thinking process, which is mostly an endless and mindless stream of jabbering mental chatter, memory traces of the past and worry waves about the future. As all this garbage of the mind floats happily and mindlessly along, we look at the cesspool and call it "I"!

We are not our thoughts. We are not our emotions. We are not our memories. We are what is happening now, in every moment, but we are not paying attention to what is happening now, we are really paying attention to all that other crap! As soon as we stop looking at the garbage and calling it "I", as soon as we start to pay attention to what is happening NOW, life, and everything in it, takes on an entirely different quality.

This is why people so often say to me "since reading The Principles, I find they apply to everything." People tell me all the time "my skiing really improved, I used The Principles", or, "my golf game got so much better", or it may be bowling, or tennis. Why is this so? It is very simple. The first point made in The Principles is this: your intense PRESENCE, your ATTENTION, is absolutely required to be a good or great guitarist, or a good or great anything. The second point made is: you are probably NOT paying attention, and you are not even paying attention to the fact that you are not paying attention.

As soon as we DO pay attention, really pay attention, something happens. Movement occurs, growth occurs, change occurs. This is the key to learning anything. As far as guitar goes, once this is established, it is just a matter of knowing what to pay attention to.


There is a very good popular phrase, describing an ability usually ascribed to very intelligent and creative people. It is called "thinking outside of the box". This is actually an example of what I have been talking about. It means the ability to step outside the assumed boundaries of a situation or condition, and see it from a radically different perspective, one that is full of potential for new discoveries and awareness's. When someone can "think outside of the box" they can solve problems other people can't because they can see things other people can't see (because those people are stuck IN the box, and can't see past its boundaries). Often, this thinking outside of the box does not resemble normal, linear thinking, but rather, comes as what is called the "intuitive flash" common to great scientists and great artists.

Being stuck in the box, as so many people are, life looks rather limited, with an inevitable structure. When we have the ability to break out of the box, we have the ability for endless expansion and growth. The way to break out of the box is to realize that "I" am NOT a little entity inside my head, looking out at the world. "I" am the one who looks, and "I" am what is being looked at as well. It is all one thing, appearing, to the conditioned mind, to be two.When I realize the truth, I now have a power to change my world that I did not have before, because I realize that I am not at the mercy of "what is happening", I am connected to, and can influence, what is happening.

The mind that is stuck "in the box" assumes that what it THINKS is happening, IS happening. It thinks that "things just are a certain way, and that's it". So, it doesn't know that "things" can be different, if "it" is different. Playing the guitar, for instance.

This dull, usual mind, thinks "playing the guitar is hard, bar chords are hard, playing fast is hard. Somehow, some people can do these hard things. Maybe I can learn to do these hard things, maybe I can't". The reality is, those who can do them, have learned to see that these things are not "hard". They simply will be whatever they are MADE to be based upon your level of understanding, and the nature of your participation (as dictated by your understanding). The very word "hard" defines the reality of the situation in a way that promotes failure. "Hard" implies impenetrable, difficult to penetrate. We should use the word "complex", meaning composed of many parts, and requiring great attention and understanding.

If I dive into water from very high up, and I hit is a certain way, the water can indeed be "hard". So hard, in fact, it could break my bones! If I land another way, if I understand certain things, the water can be very "soft" to my body. It depends on my "participation" with the water. The water itself, is nothing. It will be what it will be based on how "I" am, and how "I" relate to the water. If the person who hit the water "hard" goes around telling people, ":wow, look out for water, its hard, like rocks. Don't tell me you actually drink the stuff!", that person would receive many incredulous stares! Many of us have similar ignorant beliefs, based on the root assumption that "if I experience it that way, that is the way it is".

No matter what our level of development, In order to make progress as a guitarist, it is necessary to do a very difficult thing, something I have described in The Principles as "being aware of our unawareness". I sometimes call it "being capable of self-transcendence". And this ability depends on being able to STOP being who you habitually are, and grow beyond yourself. And this must be done, literally, in every moment. It begins when we understand that the way we think things are, the way we experience things, is not the way it necessarily "is", and in fact, there are many "layers" to reality, there are many possibilities, again, depending on our understanding and participation.

This means we must always be "suspicious" of ourselves in all things. We must never take for granted, never live on assumptions, never stop paying attention, really paying attention, to everything, but especially to this thing we call "I", that seems to be the center of everything. It isn't. It is one of an infinite number of centers.

This is why I recommend in The Principles always keeping the thought " I don't know how to play the guitar". As soon as you think you know, you will not be able to see anything new. You cannot put anything into a cup that is already full. The fact is, we can never know what anything is, because "it" is changing all the time. And we, whatever we are, must be changing at least as fast as "it" is, to simply keep up with "it"!


In our time, Quantum Physics has proven that there is a higher level of truth than that proclaimed by Descartes, and a higher level of understanding our Universe than that proclaimed by Newtonian physics. As great as the Newtonian conception of the Universe as a "giant clock" was, it could not penetrate beyond a certain point. When sub-atomic phenomena were discovered and observed, Newtonian physics broke down. Quantum Physics proved that when attention is brought down to the level of sub-atomic particles, it is not actually possible to objectively observe or "know" reality, because reality changes BECAUSE it is being observed. So, we are a part of, we ARE, what is happening.

It is easy to see this same principle at work everywhere. Look at that curious phenomena we call "the news". "The News" is the observation of human doings by human beings. In our time, this observation has become so microscopic, that "the news" actually changes because it is being observed. "Human doings" change, because other humans are watching them.

When we fully realize this, that we do not just watch what is happening, but we are what is happening, we become capable of always becoming more than we are. We take up permanent residence "outside of the box".

As much as I appreciate the technological wonders that the paradigms of Descartes and Newton made possible, I have always been more attracted to the great mystical wisdom of Socrates. This profound and likeable fellow was proclaimed as the wisest man in all the world, which caused him much consternation, because the essence of his philosophy was "the only thing I know for certain is that I know nothing for certain". He found that everyone else seemed to believe they "knew the way things were". His method was to simply question people about what they thought they knew. After Socrates careful questioning, the person who had been so sure of their knowledge, was forced to recognize they had no real knowledge whatsoever, but were actually operating on a collection of dubious assumptions. Some people appreciated having their ignorance pointed out, others did not.

Socrates' most famous pronouncement is "the unexamined life is not worth living". This is another way of saying what I have been saying. Inattention to life yields a small and shallow life. Socrates saw more deeply into life than anyone of his time because he was totally open, always living outside of the box. Principled Players will endeavor to live up to this ideal also, especially when practicing. If we can keep this attitude with the intensity it requires and deserves, always able to do that most difficult thing, becoming aware of our unawareness rather than remaining asleep to it, we will experience a constant growth and expansion toward our ever expanding goals, finding ourselves always stepping outside of the box, into infinite possibilities.

 

Classic threads by Principled Players on Principled Subjects


Great thread on why principles stress elbow movement in picking, and why it doesn't mean no other motions are used...explained by Ney, Drew, Rick.

A discussion of some powerful techniques being used by some Principled Fingerpickers to achieve independence between the middle and ring fingers.

Fascinating history of the development of various pick styles presented by pick master and pick historian Ney Mello!

Nothing like the first time! Mike tells about what could be the beginning of a (principled) teaching career, as he reports on his first impromptu, and satisfying, teaching experience.

Jasmine is experiencing the usual "growing pains" in her search for confidence as a player. Some intense advice on finding our musical identity and authority given by Ney, Jamie, Donna, and others.


WHAT IS PRECISE TIME? (Only the key to virtuosity, that's all)

Here is an interesting exchange between Ney and Jens in the forum, discussing the nuances of holding the pick.

Ney:

Al Di Meola was very fortunate to have Robert Aslanian, one of the very rare naturally principled teachers for Jazz guitar since he was a kid in NJ. One of the things Al stresses in person is super slow practice with correct precise time.

Jens:

What does Al DiMeola mean by practicing precise time??? That you play in time?

Well, I remember my early years as a young sloppy player, having a teacher TRY to explain what Ney is really talking about. The intensity of his efforts to make me understand did not quite match the depths of my ignorance, which was unfortunate for me. As a teacher, I never underestimate the depth of the student's ignorance, and never let up until understanding is achieved, and demonstrated and proven by performance.

Like most ignorant guitar students, when I had to play fast, I would just speed up and try to play fast! My teacher tried to explain that I should not just "try to play faster", which gives no clear instructions to the fingers (which is why they just tripped over each other).

People who are studying the Rhythm Course in "The Path" are getting the correct understanding that was eluding me at the time, whether they realize it or not. They are learning the real "secret of speed playing", in fact, the secret of all playing. There is no such thing as speed! Great players do not think of speed. They determine the necessary "size of the note", and perform motions that create the precisely correct beginning and end of every note.

This concept is clearly laid out in "The Path", under such sections as "Why a Musician is Like a Carpenter". Although "The Path" does not deal with developing speed ability, it nonetheless lays the proper foundation of understanding that will allow that ability to be developed.

If that doesn't entice you to buy a copy, I don't know what will!

 

FROM OUR READERS

Reader Reaction


Hello Jamie:

Just a quick note to say I totally agree with the "double trouble" theory. When I first started playing the only instrument I could borrow was a classical guitar (I wanted to play an acoustic). I was told it is really hard to learn on because of the wide neck, but heck it was what I had. I set about learning the basics and in about six months was able to get a reasonably good acoustic (although I made the mistake of getting a dreadnaught - to big for me). Anyways, when I got the acoustic it seemed so easy. Stretches? What stretches? And when I have occasionally played an electric it seems SO easy.

Peace,
Lisa

MEL BAY CHECKPOINT

The Best Things in Life Are Free!

MEL BAY CHECKPOINT 13: PAGE 38 "A SERENADE"

I have put up another checkpoint for those giving themselves a thorough musical and technical foundation with The Mel Bay Study Group. I hope more and more people will appreciate what they are getting here, and make use of it. In checkpoint 13 I am giving you incredible detailed, step by step instructions for a very challenging solo, one that I am sure is vexing many students of this book. There is a 3 measure 8th note run through a C, C#dim, D7 arpeggio that is very difficult to negotiate in tempo unless done using certain techniques, and practiced in a Principled manner. I have provided what you need to know here.

I am happy to hear from people using this course of study, and doing well with it. Chris Belot has sent me many great mp3s demonstrating his progress (Home on The Range was quite good, Chris!).

COPYRIGHT INFORMATION

All material copyright © 2003 by Jamie Andreas, GuitarPrinciples.com

Guitar Principles is a trademark of Jamie World, Inc.
Copyright 2000 - 2003 Jamie World, Inc. All rights reserved.